- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:56:20 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 05.11.2010 17:45, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:32:19 +0100, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> Good point. >> >> No, it actually should have the effect of not sending the header, and >> it would be interesting to test that. >> >> I'll update the proposal. >> >> Thx, Julian > > Note also that it violates the supposed orthogonalness of link > relations, as this would augment an existing one, much like "alternate" > does in certain scenarios. Or do I see that incorrectly? I believe we will have to acknowledge the fact that some link relations are of type "annotation" anyway. This applies to both the HTML spec and the link relations spec. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 16:57:03 UTC