- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:17:02 +0200
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Le 19/05/10 10:56, Henri Sivonen a écrit : > String that look like processing instructions (including<?php ... ?>) are non-conforming in text/html and don't cause PI DOM nodes to be created in text/html. Thus, the polyglot guide would have wrong if it didn't say that PIs don't belong in the polyglot subset. > > As for<?php ... ?> being bogus in text/html in the first place, the HTML5 spec deals with what travels over the public network, so server-side pre-processor syntaxes are out of scope. Thus editing environments that want to preserve pre-processor syntax can't even follow the HTML5 spec proper when it comes to that syntax. Henri... Nobody's editing html with php inside through a http pipe. It's local storage and your comment does not stand here. From a web author's perpective, the fact that a html instance containing a php PI won't be editable as a polyglot document is a severe limiting factor to the usefulness of polyglot documents. </Daniel>
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 09:17:34 UTC