Re: Gloss standard terminology for resource/representation (ISSUE-81 Change Proposal)

On 05.05.2010 18:57, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> I have opened bug
>>> <>, "be more
>>> specific in external references" -- this applies not only to the case
>>> that Dan mentioned, but to many other sections in the spec. (So we can
>>> discuss it separately from ISSUE-81).
>> Thanks. Given that separate bug report, do you still object to closing
>> ISSUE-81?
> Julian: Ping?

I believe that somebody needs to do a review of the spec and confirm 
that the definition and the spec are in sync, and that there are no 
issues left. I'm planning to do this at some point, but can't give a date.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:35:24 UTC