- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 12:57:25 -0400
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
On 04/30/2010 05:42 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Apr 30, 2010, at 6:51 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> On 29.04.2010 10:31, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >>> ... >>>> I also note that the current text got objections from both Roy and me, >>>> and Dan was proposing to make the citations more specific (which I >>>> supported). >>> >>> What we're looking for now (were, actually, the deadline has now passed) >>> is for people who object to closing the issue without prejudice, rather >>> than people who object to the details of the text. As acknowledged in >>> the CfC, we know some people would like more extensive changes, but we >>> believe there has been more than adequate time to express other points >>> of view in the form of a Change Proposal. >>> ... >> >> I have opened bug >> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9627>, "be more >> specific in external references" -- this applies not only to the case >> that Dan mentioned, but to many other sections in the spec. (So we can >> discuss it separately from ISSUE-81). > > Thanks. Given that separate bug report, do you still object to closing > ISSUE-81? Julian: Ping? > Regards, > Maciej - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:57:56 UTC