- From: Benoit Piette <benoit.piette@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 22:31:08 -0400
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 3 May 2010 02:31:41 UTC
... > > <section has-details> > Spoilers for Star Wars! > <details> > Luke killed Vader in the study with the candlestick. > </details> > </section> > > over... > > <details> > <summary>Spoilers for Star Wars!</summary> > Luke killed Vader in the study with the candlestick. > </details> > > ? > > ~TJ > The first one is more flexible, but that does not count in this particular example. I still think that it is weird to have the summary inside the details element, because the details is not the summary ;-) It would depend on the context surrounding the element. Is it stand alone, part of a list, is it a section, inside an aside ? Depending where the details is, the enclosing details element could very be redondant. Of course, if it would be a div, it replaces it, but if it is anything else, then it is probably redundant. Do you have a list of examples of details type usage on the Web ? I personally don't, but I'll try to find the time to check. -Benoit
Received on Monday, 3 May 2010 02:31:41 UTC