- From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:10:02 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTMLwg <public-html@w3.org>
Le 21 févr. 2010 à 04:35, Julian Reschke a écrit :
> What's important is whether the new text/html will allow existing HTML4 content to stay valid; content including things like @profile, for instance. Right now it doesn't, and I believe that is a problem.
Also, "text/html" is mentionned in at least two other documents:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2002 15:12:27 GMT
In XHTML Media Types
At http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-xhtml-media-types-20020801/#text-html
[long section cut]
AND
On Thu, 01 Aug 2002 13:56:02 GMT
In XHTML 1.0: The Extensible HyperText Markup Language (Second Edition)
At http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#media
5.1. Internet Media Type
XHTML Documents which follow the guidelines set
forth in Appendix C, "HTML Compatibility
Guidelines" may be labeled with the Internet Media
Type "text/html" [RFC2854], as they are compatible
with most HTML browsers. Those documents, and any
other document conforming to this specification,
may also be labeled with the Internet Media Type
"application/xhtml+xml" as defined in [RFC3236].
For further information on using media types with
XHTML, see the informative note [XHTMLMIME].
--
Karl Dubost
Montréal, QC, Canada
http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 16:10:14 UTC