- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:00:26 +0100
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 17.02.2010 16:00, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 16.02.2010 00:18, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> ... >>> I did. Here. The suggestion is not to say "HTML specifications", but >>> simply "specification". Microdata is *not* an "HTML specification". >> >> It's an extension to HTML5 with HTML in the title and if our CfC goes >> through will be published by the HTML WG. But by that standard, >> HTML+RDFa would also be an "HTML specification". So I agree the term is >> not enlightening. Probably the least ambiguous thing to do is either >> list the three specs covered, or split the bug lists somehow. >> ... > > So can we please get this fixed? Does it need a Bugzilla entry? > ... Now raised as <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9057>. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 22:01:28 UTC