- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:00:08 +0100
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 16.02.2010 00:18, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > ... >> I did. Here. The suggestion is not to say "HTML specifications", but >> simply "specification". Microdata is *not* an "HTML specification". > > It's an extension to HTML5 with HTML in the title and if our CfC goes > through will be published by the HTML WG. But by that standard, > HTML+RDFa would also be an "HTML specification". So I agree the term is > not enlightening. Probably the least ambiguous thing to do is either > list the three specs covered, or split the bug lists somehow. > ... So can we please get this fixed? Does it need a Bugzilla entry? Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 15:00:48 UTC