- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:44:01 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 17.02.2010 11:05, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > On 17/02/2010, at 8:53 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> So if you want to test with a link relation that could apply to Atom as well, go ahead. rel=canonical seems to be a good candidate, having multiple implementations already (right?). > > > Well, yes, but that wouldn't test the new procedures, which I think is the point. Point taken. > Also, since canonical was IIRC a collaboration between several companies, they should work together on the registration... Indeed. I was replying to Ian, who, after all, works for one of these companies. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 10:44:41 UTC