W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:44:01 +0100
Message-ID: <4B7BC871.4040100@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 17.02.2010 11:05, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> On 17/02/2010, at 8:53 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> So if you want to test with a link relation that could apply to Atom as well, go ahead. rel=canonical seems to be a good candidate, having multiple implementations already (right?).
> Well, yes, but that wouldn't test the new procedures, which I think is the point.

Point taken.

> Also, since canonical was IIRC a collaboration between several companies, they should work together on the registration...

Indeed. I was replying to Ian, who, after all, works for one of these 

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 10:44:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:58 UTC