Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals

On 17.02.2010 11:05, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> On 17/02/2010, at 8:53 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> So if you want to test with a link relation that could apply to Atom as well, go ahead. rel=canonical seems to be a good candidate, having multiple implementations already (right?).
> Well, yes, but that wouldn't test the new procedures, which I think is the point.

Point taken.

> Also, since canonical was IIRC a collaboration between several companies, they should work together on the registration...

Indeed. I was replying to Ian, who, after all, works for one of these 

Best regards, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 10:44:41 UTC