W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Chairs Solicit Proposals

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:05:33 +1100
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <79C77EE5-B7D6-4C21-BA4E-3D421E443A33@mnot.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On 17/02/2010, at 8:53 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> So if you want to test with a link relation that could apply to Atom as well, go ahead. rel=canonical seems to be a good candidate, having multiple implementations already (right?).

Well, yes, but that wouldn't test the new procedures, which I think is the point.

Also, since canonical was IIRC a collaboration between several companies, they should work together on the registration...


Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 10:06:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:58 UTC