- From: Shelley Powers <shelleypowers@burningbird.net>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:38:24 -0600
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: Kornel Lesinski <kornel@geekhood.net>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Feb 14, 2010, at 7:32 AM, Kornel Lesinski wrote: > >> >> My rationale for inclusion/keeping srcdoc in the spec: >> >> * It's easier to use. Compared to sandbox without src, srcdoc >> requires less changes to server-side applications that generate >> markup. Applications can continue to generate entire page as a single >> response rather than having to split page into many separate documents. >> >> * It's safer. It allows secure use of sandbox without having to set >> appropriate MIME types for responses. Based on experience with XHTML, >> MIME types are not widely understood by authors and often ignored or >> used inappropriately. >> >> * It's faster. On broadband connections number of requests is very >> important factor of site's performance, often more important than >> size of the document itself. Unlike sandbox with src, srcdoc does not >> increase required number of requests. > > It would be fine to paste this in as the rationale or even just link > to this message in the archives. > > Regards, > Maciej > > I would also like to hear Ian's rationale, though I thank Kornel for providing _something_. Shelley
Received on Sunday, 14 February 2010 17:39:02 UTC