- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:08:57 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> As far as I can tell (not having access to the member archives), there are >> objections (formal or not) about publishing some of the split-out material >> as FPWD, and potentially the update to RDFa (not sure about that). Some of >> the reasons have been discussed over and over again in the last weeks, so >> I'm not sure why people appear to be surprised. >> >> Unless I'm missing something, this does not affect the W3C specification >> called HTML5. Anyone who claims so is spreading misinformation on purpose. > > Making HTML5 more modular does not mean that the modules are not > HTML5. The term "HTML5" covers more than just the specification > called "HTML5" in the w3c. That's not even getting into the popular > conception of the term, which throws an even wider net. Apparently we disagree. Microdata is not part of HTML5. It's not a module. Nor is RDFa. Both are extensions. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 22:09:41 UTC