W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:08:57 +0100
Message-ID: <4B75D179.5070000@gmx.de>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> As far as I can tell (not having access to the member archives), there are
>> objections (formal or not) about publishing some of the split-out material
>> as FPWD, and potentially the update to RDFa (not sure about that). Some of
>> the reasons have been discussed over and over again in the last weeks, so
>> I'm not sure why people appear to be surprised.
>> Unless I'm missing something, this does not affect the W3C specification
>> called HTML5. Anyone who claims so is spreading misinformation on purpose.
> Making HTML5 more modular does not mean that the modules are not
> HTML5.  The term "HTML5" covers more than just the specification
> called "HTML5" in the w3c.  That's not even getting into the popular
> conception of the term, which throws an even wider net.

Apparently we disagree.

Microdata is not part of HTML5. It's not a module. Nor is RDFa. Both are 

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 22:09:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:58 UTC