Re: clarification on Adobe Blocking

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Julian Reschke <> wrote:
> As far as I can tell (not having access to the member archives), there are
> objections (formal or not) about publishing some of the split-out material
> as FPWD, and potentially the update to RDFa (not sure about that). Some of
> the reasons have been discussed over and over again in the last weeks, so
> I'm not sure why people appear to be surprised.
> Unless I'm missing something, this does not affect the W3C specification
> called HTML5. Anyone who claims so is spreading misinformation on purpose.

Making HTML5 more modular does not mean that the modules are not
HTML5.  The term "HTML5" covers more than just the specification
called "HTML5" in the w3c.  That's not even getting into the popular
conception of the term, which throws an even wider net.


Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 22:00:03 UTC