W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:39:44 +0100
Message-ID: <4B6C9020.4080406@gmx.de>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Jonas Sicking wrote:
> ...
> In other words, this is not to say that I see anything particularly
> wrong with the vocabularies. I'd just rather see them developed
> separately to the core language.
> ...


For instance, I'd like to see RDF people, Microformats people, Microdata 
people and the IETF Vcarddav WG *collaborate* on a single vocabulary.

It would then be much more interesting to compare the various proposed 

Does *anybody* support that the separated-out Microdata draft 
re-introduces the predefined vocabularies?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 5 February 2010 21:40:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:58 UTC