Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts)

On Feb 3, 2010, at 1:58 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:

> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Paul Cotton wrote:
>> 3. References
>>> [HTML5] 
>>> HTML5, I. Hickson. WHATWG, August 2009.
>> The HTML5 reference in this document points to the WHAT WG version of 
>> HTML5.  This reference should be changed in the W3C FPWD to point to the 
>> W3C version of HTML5.
> Why?

It would be fine (as far as I'm concerned) to point to both the W3C and WHATWG versions, like XHR does:

I think omitting mention of the W3C copy is a weird thing for a W3C spec to do. In this case, especially so since the WHATWG copy actually contains most of the text of the Microdata spec itself.


Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 10:23:43 UTC