- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:49:04 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > [in reply to suggestions by Larry] > > In general, I have no problem with these wording changes, in that none > of them are false or misleading. But I do have three minor comments > here: > > 1) "does not imply endorsement by the majority of members of the W3C > HTML working group" ==> Strictly speaking, it does not imply endorsement > by *any* of the members of the W3C HTML Working Group, but saying "the > majority of" implies that a majority disapproves. I do not think that is > established. Nor is majority endorsement a relevant standard for W3C > decisions. Thus, I think both HTML Microdata and HTML+RDFa should simply > say: "The publication of this document by the W3C as a W3C Working Draft > does not imply endorsement by the W3C HTML Working Group or the W3C as a > whole." I haven't included that exact text because there was already more strongly-worded text to that effect that was carefully crafted in response to much earlier comments. Please let me know if that is a problem. I didn't make the other changes Larry suggested since Maciej disagreed with them. Please let me know if there are specific edits that do need to be made that I missed. (I haven't yet looked at the edits Paul requested.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 09:49:34 UTC