- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 08:05:08 +0000
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@marklogic.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:58 AM, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> wrote: > What does seem clear to many is that the current stack of NEWT (New Exciting > Web Technologies - > http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2010/meet-newt-new-exciting-web-technologies/), > of which HTML5 is clearly a corner-stone, seems to be heavily focused on Web > Applications, with the idea of "The Semantic Web" trailing off in the > distance, at least in the minds of many (including mainstream media). Hmm. It hardly seems surprising that the media is more interested in shiny web applications than RDF. What does this have to do with this task force? None of the previous threads even mentioned the semantic web; they were all concerned entirely with serialization and parsing details. > If, as Ian asserts, HTML5 actually brings "the two... in fact closer than > ever", then proof should be easy to produce and confirm that no problem > exists. This seems like a strawman since Ian was talking about text/html and XML not HTML5 and the semantic web. > If the real desire however is to ensure that the two pursuits of Web > Applications and the Semantic Web remain close enough together that they can > exist inter-operably, then an exercise that undertakes a real examination to > ensure that this goal is being met surely should be welcomed, and if indeed > chasms (intended or otherwise) are discovered then we can act collectively > to address those rifts before they become insurmountable. I think it's a category error to equate any particular serialization like XML with the semantic web. The semantic web is about vocabularies and a data model (RDF). Yes, it's had a long association with XML as a technology - but so what? There's nothing essential about that association. People are actively working on deep RDF integration into text/html via not only HTML+RDFa but also microformats-to-RDF translations and microdata. Web-scale RDFa deployment seems to be happening in a text/html context: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/opengraph http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/05/introducing-rich-snippets.html http://drupal.org/node/574624 If this task force were primarily concerned with the semantic web and text/html, then it would be poorly named and likely to be duplicating the existing joint work of the RDFa WG and HTML WG on HTML+RDFa. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-in-html/ I encourage those interested in semantic web HTML integration to focus their efforts on improving that specification (and/or microdata and the microformats-to-RDF mapping). -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Wednesday, 29 December 2010 08:05:43 UTC