- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 02:03:36 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, public-html@w3.org
On Aug 21, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> >> Are there any link relations that have an effect on both <a>/<area> and >> on <link>, but not the same effect? > > In some cases "alternate", but for all practical purposes (and for the > purposes of a registry) no, not as far as I know. I would recommend > avoiding doing that, too, so we could indeed split it into orthogonal > concerns: where the relation is conforming, what kind of relation it is, > its synonyms, and the obvious stuff like name, description, and spec(s). In that case, I'm not clear on why separate "effect on <a>/<area>" and "effect on <link>" fields are required. Regards, Maciej
Received on Sunday, 22 August 2010 09:04:09 UTC