Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry

On 22.08.2010 05:26, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> Are there any link relations that have an effect on both<a>/<area>  and
>> on<link>, but not the same effect?
> In some cases "alternate", but for all practical purposes (and for the
> purposes of a registry) no, not as far as I know. I would recommend
> avoiding doing that, too, so we could indeed split it into orthogonal
> concerns: where the relation is conforming, what kind of relation it is,
> its synonyms, and the obvious stuff like name, description, and spec(s).

Funny enough, I raised the topic over one week ago, and made a similar 
suggestion, see 
Part 2. Would have been nice to lead this discussion in this thread. But 
it's nice we're now making progress.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Sunday, 22 August 2010 08:52:56 UTC