- From: Steven Roussey <sroussey@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:52:38 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 09.08.2010 19:04, Steven Roussey wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Anne van Kesteren<annevk@opera.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:57:00 +0200, Jonas Sicking<jonas@sicking.cc> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Btw, we're only talking about dropping the http-equiv="link", right? >>>> Not the "real" http header? >>> >>> I was. >> >> Is that for HTTP/1.0 only or HTTP/1.1 as well? > > Why would it be for HTTP/1.0 only? Because between RFC2068 (1.0) and RFC2616 (1.1), it was removed from the spec. I think the HTML 4.01 spec makes a reference to it (which was different from the HTML 4.0 spec). Merely curious... -s
Received on Monday, 9 August 2010 21:53:31 UTC