- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:40:26 +0200
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, sroussey@network54.com, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 17.04.2010 10:40, Sam Ruby wrote: > ... > I happen to believe that if everybody in this working group is allowed > to hold up even one issue per person until we are close to declaring > Last Call, we will never get to Last Call. > > I will encourage the co-chairs to push forward with steps that will > produce either an amicable resolution or a decision as soon as the > discussion stops providing new information. > > As for me, I can live with either of the following: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/0333.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/0501.html I could live with Tab's rewritten text on SHOULD vs MUST, but I still think we need to get rid of the meaningless "unreferenceable" requirement (which my CP covered). In the meantime I posted about more problems with the algorithm and didn't get any feedback (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/0500.html). Do I need to open a new bug? > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 17 April 2010 09:42:20 UTC