- From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:09:00 -0500
- To: sroussey@network54.com
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Steven Roussey <sroussey@gmail.com> wrote: > I still assert that using the html as a feed is a bad idea, regardless of > any algorithm change: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/0506.html > > Steven Roussey > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Apr 16, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >>> >>> I object to summarily removing it. If it does become an LC blocker, >>> I'd support removing it; it'll remain the WHATWG version of the spec >>> in any case. I believe the issues with the algorithm are minor and >>> can be resolved quickly, though. >> >> All right, let's see if we can come up with an algorithm change that no >> one objects to, otherwise this issue may end up going to a poll and written >> decision. >> >> Regards, >> Maciej >> >> > > I also object to keeping the section, and to continuing the discussion on the algorithm until this higher level decision is made. If this becomes a WhatWG thing, then it can be resolved in the WhatWG email list. Or perhaps among the Atom community, who can provide assistance. Shelley
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 23:09:34 UTC