Re: ISSUE 86 and removing atom transform section - focusing

I still assert that using the html as a feed is a bad idea, regardless of
any algorithm change:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/0506.html
Steven Roussey

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:

>
> On Apr 16, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>
>
>> I object to summarily removing it.  If it does become an LC blocker,
>> I'd support removing it; it'll remain the WHATWG version of the spec
>> in any case.  I believe the issues with the algorithm are minor and
>> can be resolved quickly, though.
>>
>
> All right, let's see if we can come up with an algorithm change that no one
> objects to, otherwise this issue may end up going to a poll and written
> decision.
>
> Regards,
> Maciej
>
>
>