Re: ISSUE 86 and removing atom transform section - focusing

On 16.04.2010 22:19, Shelley Powers wrote:
> The other thread is getting so messy with so many change proposals,
> it's hard to figure what's going on.
>
> I think it would be best if we resolve one thing first, and then move on.
>
> There's a change proposal...somewhere...about removing the Atom
> section from the spec. Several folks have expressed support for this
> option.
>
> Why don't we resolve this, first, then if the suggestion to remove the
> section fails, the group can move into the gory tech details.

+1

Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 20:39:46 UTC