W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2010

Re: ISSUE-99 (meta-scheme): Chairs Solicit Proposals

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:20:09 +0200
Message-ID: <4BBDF429.9020200@gmx.de>
To: tantek@cs.stanford.edu
CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, 'Manu Sporny' <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
On 08.04.2010 16:54, Tantek Celik wrote:
> Julian,
> Could you provide at least a couple of URLs to real world (not just test/demo) pages on the web that use meta scheme and at least attempt to use profile? (I personally don't know of any).

Here are two:

<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2616.html> (yes, that was created 
by my own code, coded according to DC-HTML)

<http://www.esd.org.uk/standards/ipsv/> (this one was mentioned in 
earlier mailing list threads about @scheme)

It would be interesting to see whether this is used outside DC-HTML...

> I plan to follow the design principles of the HTML WG and base the documentation of this feature in the "HTML5 profile" specification at least informed somewhat by current usage.
> Alternately, if no real world meta/scheme+profile examples are found, then I will document it based on the theoretical description mentioned below in HTML4 and mark the feature as experimental/at-risk in the draft (per W3C terminology - if 2 interop implementations cannot be demonstrated by the time we reach last call, then the feature will be automatically dropped without prejudice to enter CR).
> I hope that is sufficient to resolve this issue amicably.

What I'm looking for is a combination of specs (HTML5 + extensions) 
under which documents using this do not become non-conforming.

As with other less-frequently used features of HTML4, I'm open to 
deprecating/replacing them, but if we do so there should be a transition 
period allowing migration to something else.

(This is related to Shelley's new issue "obsconf" (106), and the general 
discussion about conformance criteria.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:20:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:16 UTC