- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:43:05 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Apr 7, 2010, at 4:41 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 03.04.2010 00:32, Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 02.04.2010 22:41, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >>> ... >>> Even if these documents do not actually affect the registration, I >>> think >>> they are still a problem. It seems like a bad idea to have >>> documents, >>> whether WG Notes or RECs, that claim things about text/html which >>> are in >>> not accordance with the MIME registration, and which are not going >>> to be >>> submitted to IANA. That seems likely to create confusion. >>> ... >> >> Absolutely. >> >> I just wanted to clarify what just publishing a doc in W3C spec >> doesn't >> change the media type. The IANA needs to be told as well. >> ... > > Maybe we can add this topic to tomorrow's agenda again? It would be > great if somebody who knows could actually report about what exactly > is going on (what's the document that was mentioned? what is its > status?). The Chairs are expecting a status update on this by next week's telecon. Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:43:39 UTC