- From: Joe D Williams <joedwil@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:36:52 -0800
- To: "Adam Barth" <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Cc: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "Gavin Carothers" <gavin@carothers.name>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "HTMLwg" <public-html@w3.org>
> the response is treated as text/plain We are using an html browser, so when we expect it is utf-8, then why not also expect that text/html is being sent? Especially if file begins with blank text, until unexpected character proves differently. Thanks, Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Barth" <w3c@adambarth.com> To: "Joe D Williams" <joedwil@earthlink.net> Cc: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>; "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>; "Gavin Carothers" <gavin@carothers.name>; "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>; "HTMLwg" <public-html@w3.org> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 11:05 AM Subject: Re: XMLNS in Inkscape and other editors > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Joe D Williams > <joedwil@earthlink.net> wrote: >>> You're correct that BOMs are optional when you correctly specify >>> the >>> media type of your content. >> >> Sorry if I'm off track or too limited in the definition, but no, I >> thought >> the BOM was optional if you intended to serve utf-8 regardless of >> the media >> type. Independent of anything else, if you get a utf-8 BOM, then >> you have >> utf-8. If you don't get a BOM it is also utf-8 (except for those >> media types >> that would never use utf-8?). Either way, in principle you know you >> have >> utf-8 (except for those media types that would never use utf-8?). . > > Indeed, which is why the response is treated as text/plain instead > of > application/octet-stream. > > Adam
Received on Monday, 23 November 2009 19:37:39 UTC