- From: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:22:46 -0500
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:47:15PM +0000, Henri Sivonen wrote: > Now, I'd like to ask from everyone who has argued the position that the > Application may continue processing the stream after the XML 1.0 Processor > has signaled a fatal error: > * Do you believe the above construction black-box-testably constitutes an > XML 1.0 Processor and (a part of) an Application? (If not, why not?) > * Do you believe the construction subverts the intent of the XML 1.0 spec? > (If not, why not?) http://diveintomark.org/archives/2004/08/16/specs (to be read as a humorous take, of course). -- Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2009 13:23:05 UTC