- From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:31:02 -0500
- To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Cc: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
James Graham scripsit: > The alternative I was alluding to is serving HTML rather than XML, thus > neatly avoiding the whole issue. Remember that what I'm arguing against is the need for a general-purpose XML with forgiving parsing (aka "XML5", though "SGML" would be a better name), and why draconian parsing isn't a problem for general-purpose XML. I'm not opposed to a forgiving language for displaying documents in browsers, or I wouldn't be here at all. -- John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org All "isms" should be "wasms". --Abbie
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 16:31:40 UTC