- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:09:10 +0100
- To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- CC: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, public-html@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
John Cowan wrote: > Boris Zbarsky scripsit: > >> I don't know what you mean by "legal", but every possible sequence of >> bytes has a fixed interpretation as an HTML5 document... > > Well, when I look at 9.1 of the 27 October 2009 draft, I see "Documents > must consist of the following parts", and in 9.1.1 "A DOCTYPE is a mostly > useless, but required, header". What is the effect of violating these > mandatory constraints? See section 9.2 "Parsing HTML Documents" [1] [1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#parsing
Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2009 16:09:15 UTC