W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2009

Re: the MathML comments

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:42:28 -0800
To: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: "HTMLWG WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "Shelley Powers" <shelley.just@gmail.com>, "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
Message-ID: <op.u20902wg64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook.local>
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:49:35 -0800, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>  
> As this is something that I see us doing again, and without further  
> discussing what was said previously, can we agree on a simple factual  
> statement that we accompany such responses going forward, such as:
> "These comments were collected and reviewed by the working group, but  
> were not formally assessed for consensus."

The problem in this meeting was that we did not even know that the HTML WG  
made those comments and what the contents of the comments were. I think  
most people in the room hadn't had a chance yet to look at the comments  
but they were already submitted to the Math WG on behalf of the HTML WG.  
It was quite confusing.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Saturday, 7 November 2009 16:43:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:02 UTC