- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:01:50 +0900
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, public-iri@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
Hello Julian, Anne, Thanks for pointing out what may turn out to be a backreference (or "free variable") in the IRI spec. We will try to limit these to the minimum. One other one that I already cursorily discussed with Ian is "white space". HTML5 has a very specific definition for that which may not be the same for other formats (e.g. CSS?). Regards, Martin. On 2009/11/04 12:53, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:57:48 -0800, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >>> From <http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#urls>: >> >> "To resolve a URL to an absolute URL relative to either another >> absolute URL or an element, the user agent must use the resolve a Web >> address algorithm defined by the Web addresses specification. >> [WEBADDRESSES]" >> >> WEBADDRESSES (<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/href/draft>), when defining >> this, has lots of references to the HTML "Document" object. >> >> These aren't going to end up in IRIbis, right? So it appears that >> IRIbis will not be able to replace WEBADDRESSES as a reference >> completely. Does stuff need to move back from WEBADDRESSES into HTML5? > > Yes. That should probably be sorted out when iri-bis is somewhat more > stable. > > -- #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2009 11:02:55 UTC