- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:56:41 -0800
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
It is precisely this mis-match (well, and the incorrect appearance of uncorrected material) we hope to avoid. plugins are an issue, agreed. On Nov 4, 2009, at 0:11 , Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Nov 3, 2009, at 22:08, Dave Singer wrote: > >> In a CSS working group discussion today, we discussed color >> correction as it applies to colors in CSS and untagged images. The >> question came up as to how untagged video should be treated. We'd >> like to say that it is treated as being sRGB (consistently), as >> this generally matches 709 colors. The question is, is this OK? > > As an author, I'd expect unlabeled images, unlabeled videos and > unlabeled NPAPI-plug-in graphics surfaces to be in the same color > space as unlabeled CSS colors. > > That is, if unlabeled CSS colors are implemented as sRGB, unlabeled > video should be sRGB, too, but if unlabeled CSS colors are > implemented as platform colors, it's not OK to go ahead and put only > videos in sRGB. > > Previously, implementing color "correction" for bitmaps and CSS out > of sync has lead to a lot of grief for authors. Remember pre-Tiger > Safari: > http://hsivonen.iki.fi/png-gamma/ > > -- > Henri Sivonen > hsivonen@iki.fi > http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ > > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standard, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2009 18:57:23 UTC