- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:35:34 +0000
- To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Update on forthcoming Last Calls: 1) Last Calls were the HTML WG was specifically requested to do a review The Web Apps Working Group has notified the HTML WG co-chairs that several of their specifications are approaching Last Call status. It would be useful for the HTML WG to decide if we want to collectively review the following documents which will soon reach Last Call status: a) Server-Sent Events http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ b) Web Database http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/ c) Web Sockets API http://dev.w3.org/html5/websockets/ d) Web Storage http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/ e) Web Workers http://dev.w3.org/html5/workers/ >2) Last Calls were the HTML WG was NOT identified explicitly to do a review. LCWD#3 of Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration, Oct 29 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2009OctDec/0179.html /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Cotton Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 9:24 PM To: public-html@w3.org Subject: RE: ACTION-127: establish process for "official WG response" to other WG's RFC on LC drafts [resending to get the formatting better] > I am collecting data on Last Call data from the HCG and need to organize this list so we are prepared for the upcoming reviews. >From my survey of the Hypertext Coordination Group I believe that the most imminent other Last Call specification, would be a second Last Call version of InkML from the Multimodal Interaction WG. This might be of interest to the HTML WG because of the possibility of embedding an InkML canvas in a web page for capture, display or editing of ink. > To get started on ACTION-127 I reviewed the Last Call announcements since Jan 2009: I have now reviewed the W3C Chairs email list (member-only) for Last Call Working Drafts since Jul 2009. I have split these recent Last Calls into two categories (see below): 1) Last Calls were the HTML WG was specifically requested to do a review 2) Last Calls were the HTML WG was NOT identified explicitly to do a review. >From this data I conclude that we need to determine if the HTML WG wants to review the "Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies: Last Call Working Draft". I plan to discuss this with WG members next week at the TPAC meeting. I believe this work completes my efforts on determining the candidate specifications that the HTML WG might review. I believe the process of reviewing the MathML Last Call will teach us how to go forward with such reviews. /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 1) Last Calls were the HTML WG was specifically requested to do a review a) Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies: Last Call Working Draft, Oct 6 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2009OctDec/0018.html Note: Review by HTML WG was requested. b) MathML 3.0 Last Call Draft http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2009JulSep/0072.html Note: Review by HTML WG is underway. 2) Last Calls were the HTML WG was NOT identified explicitly to do a review. a) Widgets 1.0: Widget URIs Last Call, Oct 8 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2009OctDec/0022.html Note: No review by HTML requested. b) "Widgets 1.0: Widget URIs" Last Call Draft, Oct 6 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2009OctDec/0013.html Note: No review by HTML requested. c) MathML for CSS profile Last Call Draft, Oct 1 http://sts.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2009OctDec/0003.html Note: No review by HTML WG requested. d) Widgets 1.0: APIs and Events, Aug 18 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2009JulSep/0035.html Note: No review by HTML WG requested.
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2009 18:37:01 UTC