- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:34:30 +0200
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Cc: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, "public-xml-core-wg@w3.org" <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Nov 3, 2009, at 17:06, Shelley Powers wrote: > I'm going to focus on the relevant part of this discussion to the HTML > WG: there are rules defined for how undefined entities are handled, > and these rules defined in the XML specification. There may be some > issues of interpretation, but such issues are specific to the XML > spec, not the HTML5 spec. > > As such, no further explanations or additional specifications are > necessary in HTML5. > > Am I correct in this? Not in my opinion. If predictably uniform behavior between UAs is wanted and if we want to make it non-mysterious for implementors how to performantly parse application/xhtml+xml content written for browsers, this WG should specify normative entity resolver behavior (i.e. mappings from public id and system id pairs onto streams). As a practical matter, if I'm using SAX in Java, I can't get a browser- style EntityResolver off-the-shelf as part of a common org.apache package. (Or maybe I could but I'm unaware.) -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2009 16:35:07 UTC