- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:04:53 -0700
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On May 28, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On May 28, 2009, at 12:22 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
>> On May 28, 2009, at 3:17 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>> On May 28, 2009, at 12:52 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> HTML application = {HTML interpreter, HTML generator}
>>>
>>> Please see my post on this thread for why the term "HTML
>>> interpreter" is inaccurate and grating.
>>
>> I saw it. I suggest you do a little more research on the term,
>> because Larry is about thirty years ahead of you on that.
>> See Interlisp.
>
> First of all, this is an argument from authority.
>
> Second, if you are trying to make some connection, HTML
> implementations don't work at all the way Interlisp did, and are
> even more certainly not required to per spec.
>
> Third, if Larry feels there is a resemblance between
I meant to say: Third, if Larry feels there is a resemblance between
his implementation work on Interlisp and the general category of all
applications that consume HTML, he can say so. But I don't think that
is at all what he meant.
Regards,
Maciej
Received on Friday, 29 May 2009 00:05:30 UTC