- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:00:20 -0700
- To: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On May 26, 2009, at 5:23 AM, Shelley Powers wrote: > > Agree. > I notice the option for the chair to re-open the discussion if new > information is presented. I'm assuming this would include taking a > new vote on the document. > > In light of the objections given in this longish discussion thread, > and what seems to have been a lack of addressing such objections, > properly, from the first vote, I believe that Sam Ruby and Chris > Wilson should re-open this topic, formally--including taking a new > vote on the document, and handling any new objections that arise > using the proper procedure. > > I don't think this would be an onerous burden on the working group, > would it? I don't have a problem with holding another vote. However, raising objections or citing problems doesn't have to be tied to a survey. If you have comments you would like to make, then feel free to do so in email to the list. I think it would make more sense to just field any outstanding comments, including new ones that come in, and then take a WG decision about publishing the document as a WG Note. In the meantime hopefully we can publish new Working Drafts as appropriate. Regards, Maciej
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 17:00:58 UTC