- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 16:41:00 +0300
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On May 22, 2009, at 15:54, Julian Reschke wrote: > RFC 2731 (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2731.html>) and DC- > HTML (<http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-html/>) already define a > different syntax for that; so; *if* we wanted to do that, we should > consider just using that. Do existing RFC 2731 or DC-HTML consumers actually do prefix-based indirection with scheme and refuse to work without profile or do they just hard-code strings like "dc.title" and ignore both profile and scheme? > In recent discussions, the RDFa people claimed that non-registered > link relations did not work in HTML 4.01 unless qualified by a > profile; if there was agreement about that, RDFa would need that as > well because of the use of CURIEs. My understanding is that stuff like rel=license, rel=nofollow and rel=prefetch work where supported regardless of profiles. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 13:41:46 UTC