- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:42:14 +0200
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Henri Sivonen wrote: > On May 22, 2009, at 12:32, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> Henri Sivonen wrote: >>> On May 22, 2009, at 11:23, Julian Reschke wrote: >>>> I have no problem with people trying to specify this *somewhere*, >>>> but I do have a big issue with this being done in HTML5. >>> Do you have a suggestion on where "somewhere" would be, concretely? >> >> A separate What WG spec? > > If the W3C flavor of HTML5 can delegate it's pre-defined microdata > vocabulary management to the WHATWG, this seems to be a possibility. No delegation is needed. This should be orthogonal. >> A W3C Note? > > By which WG? Does it need a WG? Also, is *this* WG chartered to do this? > Regardless of which WG, Process-wise it seems like a bad idea to move > normative matter into "the accountability free realm of Working Group > Notes" (to quote Björn Höhrmann). I'm not convinced this needs to be normative. At least not at this point. >> An IETF document? > > > It would be highly unusual for a W3C spec to delegate upper layers to > the IETF rather than delegating lower layers. Unusual, but it has happened (for instance, RFC2731). Anyway: just because it may not be obvious where to standardize this stuff elsewhere doesn't mean it belongs into HTML5. BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 10:43:00 UTC