- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 22:33:32 +0200
- To: "John Foliot" <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Cc: "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 20 May 2009 22:15:32 +0200, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> wrote: > I would be happy to repair the *ONE PAGE DOCUMENT*, but as a matter of > principle, editors/authors/whatevers should at least be creating official > W3C documents that meet other W3C standards and guidelines, and the > particular item of note is both basic and glaringly obvious (and speaks, > once again, to the perception that web accessibility is paid but > lip-service by the authors/editors group). > > If somebody can shed some light on how I can update this document, I > will be happy to oblige: either right away, or would it be more productive to > wait the week or so that Sam has left open for 'final discussion' before > finalization? My point was that as per WCAG markup is used for examples. I.e. class="example". As far as I know there are no rules for W3C Technical Reports as to what the markup has to be. There was an idea some time ago to standardize some conventions for TR/ but I believe that went down in bureaucracy for now. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 20:34:18 UTC