- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:19:34 -0400
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- CC: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Laura Carlson wrote: > Thank you for seeing that all of the comments were restored to the > questionnaire: > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wdhdp/results > > Much appreciated. > >>From those comments it seems evident that the decision was exactly > what the title states, that is: to release the Design Principles as a > Working Draft. Consensus of the document's content has not been > reached. > > Shawn seemed to have thought that the principles themselves had gained > group consensus. > http://twitter.com/soypunk/status/1828939719 > > The status statement of the principles document also makes it clear > that consensus of the document's content has not been reached. > http://www.w3.org/TR/html-design-principles/#sotd > > Sam and Chris, is there a plan to try to reach consensus of content > for the design principles document? Looking at the vote, it appears that there was a Formal Objection. As such, a public, substantive response is required. Perhaps one of the authors would like to take a stab at this? Feel free to point me at it if this was already done, as I wasn't paying as close attention to this working group in 2007 as I am now. > Thanks. > > Best Regards, > Laura - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2009 17:20:19 UTC