On Jun 26, 2009, at 06:42, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > Does anyone agree with the inclusion of the microdata section? I agree with its inclusion. > It's certainly possible for a solution that no one likes to be the > right answer, I would be concerned with a feature that had a > constituency of 0. In particular, does anyone think microdata is > better than including no solutions to address the use cases at which > it is aimed? I do. It addresses what I think are the main problems with microformats (lack of well-defined processing model for consumers and document conformance definition for producers) and RDFa (prefix-based indirection, use of syntax that parses differently in XML and text/ html and complexity of the graph-based model and processing rules). -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 13:19:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:49 UTC