- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:34:48 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Julian Reschke wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > ... > > I guess I could point to the I-D, but that seems like something that is > > normally frowned upon. If that is the preferred method of operating, though, > > I guess I can do that. Are I-D URLs permanent? I was under the impression > > that I-Ds expired. > > The URLs are permanent in that they do not change; but expired I-Ds go > away (you get a 404). That's what I thought. > You can refer to an I-D as "Work in Progress", but will have to prepare > the reference when the I-D is revised (which is a good thing, btw...). Unfortunately we can't update dated drafts on the /TR/ page, and I don't want links to break. So I'll just wait til the draft is past the I-D stage, which shouldn't take too long. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 19:35:22 UTC