- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:18:43 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > ... > I guess I could point to the I-D, but that seems like something that is > normally frowned upon. If that is the preferred method of operating, > though, I guess I can do that. Are I-D URLs permanent? I was under the > impression that I-Ds expired. > ... The URLs are permanent in that they do not change; but expired I-Ds go away (you get a 404). You can refer to an I-D as "Work in Progress", but will have to prepare the reference when the I-D is revised (which is a good thing, btw...). > ... BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 10:19:30 UTC