W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2009

regrets, voting

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:17:32 -0700
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8B62A039C620904E92F1233570534C9B0118D81806C5@nambx04.corp.adobe.com>
I think I'm not going to be able to make the HTML working
group phone conference 7/30 morning -- I'm at the IETF
meeting and the IRI/IDN "bar bof" is scheduled in such
a way that I can't both be on the HTML working group
phone call and also chair the IRI discussion. 

I think my concerns and the nature of my objection to
publication of a new working draft of the current 
variation have been misrepresented, and I would
ask that if there is going be a discussion it be
scheduled for next week when I can defend myself.

On the other hand, this is a process and not a substantive
issue, and I don't think consensus is required,
whether "lazy" or explicit.

http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#Votes
"A group may also vote to make a process decision...."

I think I've made my point, and I'm willing to work
in some other way to address the difficulties I see 
with applying ordinary W3C process mechanisms to the 
unprecedented management of the HTML working group.

Larry
-- 
http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Thursday, 30 July 2009 08:18:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:48 UTC