David Singer wrote: > > > the choice of whether we use H.264, Theora, or something else (and > similarly for audio) is *completely orthogonal* to the question of > how we achieve accessibility. Also, repeated posts by myself and > others on setting up a framework for accessibility have met with > essentially *zero* response. Consider this then a formal response - I raise my hand to assist in whatever way I might. While I agree that the discussion of codec should not have any impact on the accessibility framework, it appears that this is not the case: the Working Group is grappling with codec questions and accessibility is receiving zero attention. I would welcome further discussions with you either via this forum or off line on how I might assist in this important issue. JFReceived on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 22:29:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:51 UTC