- From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "'David Singer'" <singer@apple.com>, "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>, "'James Graham'" <jgraham@opera.com>
- Cc: "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "'Robin Berjon'" <robin@berjon.com>, "'Shelley Powers'" <shelley.just@gmail.com>, <public-html@w3.org>
David Singer wrote: > > > the choice of whether we use H.264, Theora, or something else (and > similarly for audio) is *completely orthogonal* to the question of > how we achieve accessibility. Also, repeated posts by myself and > others on setting up a framework for accessibility have met with > essentially *zero* response. Consider this then a formal response - I raise my hand to assist in whatever way I might. While I agree that the discussion of codec should not have any impact on the accessibility framework, it appears that this is not the case: the Working Group is grappling with codec questions and accessibility is receiving zero attention. I would welcome further discussions with you either via this forum or off line on how I might assist in this important issue. JF
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 22:29:35 UTC