- From: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:40:30 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: public-html@w3.org, whatwg@lists.whatwg.org, Tom Heath <tom.heath@gmail.com>, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Fair point. Just brainstorming here: how about making about an attribute? <div item id="amanda" about="http://...."></div> <p>Name: <span subject="amanda" itemprop="name">Amanda</span></p> We still have two identifiers, but at least giving the URI is simplified. Best, Peter Julian Reschke wrote: > Peter Mika wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I've been taking a closer look at microdata. While I like the >> proposal in general, in particular the chance to unite microformat >> style annotations with some of the Semantic Web formalism (such as >> URIs for objects), there are still a number of points that I feel >> could be improved. So here are my proposals for discussion: >> >> #1 >> >> The use of a URI as the value of the id attribute. It seems to me >> there is actually nothing in the spec that would stop this: >> ... > > IDs like that would be very hard to use as fragment identifier... > > > ... > > BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 13:42:02 UTC