- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:32:52 +0200
- To: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org, whatwg@lists.whatwg.org, Tom Heath <tom.heath@gmail.com>, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Peter Mika wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been taking a closer look at microdata. While I like the proposal > in general, in particular the chance to unite microformat style > annotations with some of the Semantic Web formalism (such as URIs for > objects), there are still a number of points that I feel could be > improved. So here are my proposals for discussion: > > #1 > > The use of a URI as the value of the id attribute. It seems to me there > is actually nothing in the spec that would stop this: > ... IDs like that would be very hard to use as fragment identifier... > ... BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 11:33:39 UTC