- From: Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@ltgt.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:03:35 +0200
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Cc: HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > > Do we want the anomaly that <?php ... ?> is valid XHTML 5, but invalid HTML > 5? Yes, just like: - <feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"> - xmlns:foo="http://example.net" - <foo:bar /> - <p /> > What about the UA support, should it be ignored? Which UA support? In text/html, <?php is parsed as a comment (and ends at the first ">" on at least Firefox and Opera: try it with <?php echo "hello <b>world</b>!"; ?>) > What about current > validators - Validator.w3.org and HTML Tidy? And so on. Should we pretend > that support for <? > doesn't exist? In "HTML as she is spoke"? yes. -- Thomas Broyer
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2009 10:04:15 UTC