- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:56:25 +0200
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- CC: HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>
Simon Pieters On 09-07-22 11.24: > On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:07:07 +0200, Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no> > wrote: > >> Summary: Please add back support for SGML processing instructions as >> they are well supported and much used. >> >> Suppose one wants to validate a page that embeds PHP, but that one >> wants to do so /prior/ to the execution of the PHP script: > > See http://bugzilla.validator.nu/show_bug.cgi?id=581 Thanks. > I don't think it's possible to have useful validation of PHP script > prior execution. Well, I disagree - see my reply to Smylers. > Instead, I think validators should have knowledge about > common scripting and template languages and give advice that validation > should take place after execution. For PI instructions, which are defined as part of HTML, I agree that a warning saying that it is the execution result that counts, could be useful. But PIs do not need to be illegal for such a warning to be useful. -- leif halvard
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2009 09:57:05 UTC